Connie asks, probably rhetorically, but do forgive: "Obama supported age appropriate sex education. Sarah Palin says 'no sex'. Who has the better idea?"

Clearly Palin. As I parent, I prefer my children to learn about sex upon the foundations of my moral, religious, and just teaching thereof. Including the societal and personal responsibility pursuant to their choices therefrom. I favor no government institution instilling into my children any concept foreign to, or competing with, the ideology (Truth) set forth by not only my example by my words as well. Teachers ought stick with reading, writing and arithmetic, and parents ought be parents or else remove the 'burdens' so hindering their lives - that the responsibility to prepare their child for the world is so great and thus delegated to government instruction. Be a parent, or give the child to people willing to be parents. I think that is what it all boils down to.

The fact that Palin's daughter is pregnant is irrelevant. The fact that if Obama's daughters became pregnant a family night out at the abortion clinic is forthcoming, is irrelevant. Sad, but irrelevant.