he economic stability of this democratic and capitalistic country has been left to the elected officials and the process is failing. It may be difficult to grasp as there are citizens who continue to grow in wealth. But the country's debt management appears to be in the hands of electorates who have not enough math skill and only academic rhetoric that promote biased ideological agendas. The economy will continue this way until a more objective perspective is based on mathematical models that encompass the capitalistic environment. We have a current economic state that enables corporations to accumulate wealth and it is due to a sustainable infrastructure. This vast infrastructure is a complex foundation that took years to develop and America needs it. The population's majority are taxed to form it and use it for economic survival and standard of living. One example of the infrastructure is the highway and transportation systems empowering the employed to get back and forth to their places of employment. The highway and transportation systems also meet this need to fulfill employees' visits to grocery stores filled with corporate products or restaurant chains. As also is health and safety infrastructure fulfilled through justice and hospital systems. For all this to fall into place in a pure capitalistic society the question of why this complex infrastructure exists must be answered because if not for taxation it would not exist. The unquestionable answer rests in who benefits the greatest from the infrastructure. It is the burden of the capital earned that needs to ensure this infrastructure. As it is the problem of infrastructure will have negative influences on the total economic status and the condition of the infrastructure cannot be neglected by corporate America who profit the most.

Many corporations have abandoned this country's infrastructure by taking advantage of foreign employees who have much less developed infrastructures, but still benefit the monetary gain in our country's capitalistic market. These corporate practices have contributed to unemployment and for the rest to take wage cuts. Since legislators typically endorse taxation based on the employee this results in an imbalance when the math does not add up, which oddly parallels the future of Social Security. To reverse this path legislatures will be required to initiate principles to stabilize the economic situation. It is within their power for responsible representation. For corporate wealth to evolve in its capitalistic nature, capital gain portions must be interned as taxation to bolster the infrastructure. It is only simple arithmetic that can recognize what is earned by corporate America is not distributed equally in their labor force and taxation should reflect this inequality. As it is said here, corporate wealth depends on the infrastructure and taxation should reflect it.