A better title for this film might have been “The History of Apple Computers.”

“Jobs” aims to be the first biopic about tech giant Steve Jobs (Sony’s Aaron Sorkin project is next), but instead of offering insight into the man, it’s a chronology of Apple and the advent of personal computers.

Ashton Kutcher plays Jobs convincingly enough. The “Two and a Half Men” star looks uncannily like the Apple co-founder, right down to the lumbering gait, and there’s no trace of Kutcher’s kooky-character past here. But with a script by first-time screenwriter Matt Whitely that focuses more on corporate events than characters, there’s no chance to look deeper into the man behind the Mac.

Directed by Joshua Michael Stern (“Swing Vote”), “Jobs” opens with the Apple chief introducing the first iPod in 2001. Then it jumps back almost 30 years, when Jobs was a scruffy, barefoot, Reed College dropout on campus just for kicks. (James Woods appears briefly as a concerned school administrator, but is never seen again.) Jobs hallucinates in a field, travels to India, and suddenly it’s 1976, and he’s struggling in his job at Atari. Prone to outbursts and, apparently, body odor, he turns to his friend, Steve “Woz” Wozniak (Josh Gad), for help. Jobs discovers a computer prototype Woz built, and a few months later, Apple Computers is born.

Gad is the heart of the film. Though his character, like the others, is weakly developed, Gad’s vulnerability as Wozniak makes him the most relatable. There’s also heart in the soundtrack, a romp through the 1960s and 70s that includes songs by Cat Stevens, Joe Walsh and Bob Dylan.

The decade the film skips — when an ousted Jobs created his software company NeXT, which he eventually sold to Apple — seems like a lost chapter that could have illuminated it subject. How does such a driven man survive after being driven out? Instead, the film picks up in 1996, when Jobs inexplicably has a new wife and young son; his now college-age daughter snoozing on the living-room couch. He’s lured back to Apple and transforms it into the most profitable company in the world. (That’s not a spoiler, it’s history — you can check it on your iPhone.)

And that’s the problem with “Jobs.” While it’s interesting to see the history of Apple and how Jobs’ singular determination was crucial to its success, the history of a company isn’t as compelling as the history of a person, especially one as complex, innovative and influential as Steve Jobs.