Site last updated: Wednesday, September 9, 2026

Log In

Reset Password
Butler County's great daily newspaper

Closing arguments presented

PITTSBURGH — The campaign corruption case against suspended state Supreme Court Justice Joan Orie Melvin and her sister and suspended aide is one of family ties becoming “criminal ties,” a prosecutor said Friday in closing arguments.

Allegheny County Deputy District Attorney Lawrence Claus said it was understandable that aide Janine Orie and a third sister, then-state GOP Sen. Jane Orie, would support Melvin’s Supreme Court campaigns in 2003 and 2009, when she was still a Superior Court judge. But the sisters crossed the line by conspiring to misuse Melvin’s state-paid court staffers and Jane Orie’s Senate staff for political work, Claus said.

“That’s taking family ties too far,” Claus said. “That’s not what the law allows.”

Attorneys for Melvin and Janine Orie say prosecutors haven’t proved the illegal campaign work, largely because all the witnesses agreed that Melvin’s staff did their judicial work and did it well.

“If all this is true, and they were unanimous in saying that, how could there have been this campaign work to the degree they say it was going on?” argued James DePasquale, Janine Orie’s attorney.

Melvin’s attorney, Patrick Casey, agreed: “Joan Orie Melvin got the work done, she served her job, she ran her campaign with political professionals, and she paid for it with private funds.”

Casey also argued that two key prosecution witnesses “lied” when they testified about key documents, though Claus claimed the witnesses “misspoke.”

Jamie Pavlot, Jane Orie’s ex-chief of staff, testified that she oversaw political work by Senate staffers requested by all three sisters. She documented some of that with a file she took home in November 2009, days after a Senate intern prompted the DA’s investigation by complaining she saw Sen. Orie’s staffers working on Melvin’s campaign.

During Pavlot’s cross-examination, the defense noted several documents dated 2010 were in the file, which they say proved Pavlot doctored the file. Pavlot insisted the 2010 documents weren’t in the 2009 file — which Claus agreed Friday would have been a “physical impossibility.”

More in Pennsylvania News

Subscribe to our Daily Newsletter

* indicates required
TODAY'S PHOTOS