PSU board might shrink from 30 to 23
HARRISBURG — A new legislative proposal outlined Wednesday would shrink Penn State’s board from 30 to 23 voting members, a change designed to make the board work more efficiently and create a more inclusive system of doing business.
The sponsor, Sen. John Yudichak, said trustees would also be more accountable to the public if the board was reduced to eight elected alumni, five gubernatorial appointees, five elected by the agricultural community and five people from business and industry selected by the trustees.
Yudichak, D-Luzerne, called the approach “the art of the possible” and predicted it would improve the school’s governance structure without going too far.
“I don’t think it’s the place of the General Assembly to micromanage Penn State or the state-related universities,” Yudichak said.
A university spokesman released a statement saying the school welcomed Yudichak’s support and interest. Yudichak was joined at a Capitol news conference on the topic by fellow alumnus Sen. Jake Corman, a Republican who represents the State College region where Penn State’s main campus is located.
Penn State is currently reviewing its internal oversight and procedures and is considering hiring a consultant to help with that process.
Among the changes it has already adopted are removing the university president and state governor as voting trustees, establishing term limits for all trustees, posting meeting information five days ahead of time, adding public comment periods and requiring half the trustees to be in attendance in order for a meeting to be held.
Corman said the smaller board proposal could be fine-tuned and said he was supportive of another change, to cement into legislation the tradition of choosing one of the governor’s appointees from among the student body.
“We’re not trying to do a hostile takeover of the board here,” Corman said.
Penn State’s board has come under heightened scrutiny because of the Jerry Sandusky child molestation scandal, for which three top administrators face allegations of a criminal cover-up of complaints.
