When Richard Hogg, District 10 executive for the state Department of Transportation, met with Butler Eagle writers earlier this year, he spoke in an upbeat way about the proposed Route 228 project, despite an order from state transportation Secretary Allen Biehler.

The Route 228 project was among numerous others across the commonwealth that Biehler ordered for re-evaluation, at least partly in hopes of making limited transportation money stretch farther - so more work could be accomplished with the resources available.

In Butler County, there was a precedent for that kind of evaluation. A re-evaluation of the Cranberry Connector project that resulted in a scaleback of the total cost was a key factor in allowing the project to be built. Prior to that reworking, the connector had been placed in limbo because of a shortage of money.

But will what is now being proposed for Route 228 achieve all that was originally envisioned? PennDOT thinks so, but Cranberry Township officials are upset. They contend the newly announced design changes would jeopardize public safety and create more traffic problems - in part because Route 228 would be turned into a 10-lane-wide roadway at its intersection with Route 19 and Freedom Road. The earlier configuration had fewer lanes.

However, for others along the Route 228 corridor, the changes represent something more appealing, since the new proposal eliminates controversial jug-handle turnarounds and concrete medial barriers.

The positive thing amid what has evolved is that the new proposal is not yet set in concrete; changes are still possible. Final design for the project isn't targeted to begin until about 2006. Environmental work is scheduled for completion this fall.

It is the responsibility of elected officials and the public to evaluate in depth what is currently being offered and make their opinions known to PennDOT. The place to start is with District 10 headquarters in Indiana, but, if they feel it is necessary, they should also direct opinions to Biehler.

It would be foolhardy for the transportation secretary to advocate a plan that would be a detriment to the safety of the traveling public.

One point emphasized by Hogg during his meeting at the Eagle is that he welcomes public comment and frank discussion about the pros and cons of various options. He has demonstrated that kind of attitude regarding other projects that have affected this county.

However, a spirit of cooperation - despite the extent of opposition that might be evolving - is necessary from this county's standpoint also. The project's fate must not be thrust into uncertainty because of unrealistic local demands.

The key is to put together a proposal that, as much as possible, meets the concerns of the areas and people affected, within the realm of resources available to the transportation department.

Route 228 must be upgraded to meet today's needs. From the standpoint of its importance and the traffic volume it must accommodate - and what is anticipated for the future - it is woefully inadequate.

Not everyone will be satisfied with whatever plan ultimately is finalized. Regarding a project of such scope, the likelihood of total agreement is virtually nil.

"We are pleased with the results of the re-evaluation and the fact that we still have a project," Hogg said. "This community sensitive option allows us to preserve and protect what they (people and businesses in the project area) hold dear while still meeting the needs of the project."

The new proposal cuts an estimated $40 million from the previous $120 million project total. In order to preserve the project, that cost reduction represents a positive accomplishment.

The task ahead is for further discussions between PennDOT, Cranberry and other officials, and the general public. The prospect of resolving most concerns without inordinate delays is not beyond reach.

- J.R.K.