Marketplace   Menu Guide   Complete Pages      
butler eagle
Site last updated: Saturday, August 23, 2014 Bookmark our site!
Local PennsylvaniaNationalInternationalNews Extras  
Published: March 8, 2013 print this article Print save this article Save email this article Email ENLARGE TEXT increase font decrease font

Kelly vote criticized

The Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) was created in 1994 and was reauthorized in 2000 and 2005 with almost 100 percent support from both parties.
In 2011, it was time for reauthorization again. The bill went through the Senate with full support as usual of both the Democrats and Republicans.
Unfortunately, when it went to the House of Representatives, Congressman Mike Kelly, R-3rd, along with his fellow Tea-Publicans, decided that the bill needed to be modified with provisions that would put various groups of women at risk, including Native American women, immigrant women and the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community.
The version they created was not going to become law, but that did not matter to Kelly. All he cared about was keeping the bill stalled.
It did not matter to him that the VAWA programs, funding and law reforms have changed federal, tribal, state and local responses to domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault and stalking. Nor did it seem to matter to him or other Tea Party types that there are 24 victims of domestic violence every minute in this country.
After more than a year of keeping the VAWA reauthorization stalled, the House finally passed the Senate’s version, despite Kelly voting against the bill (S 47).
Don’t be fooled by his staffers who will be quick to say he supported VAWA. What Kelly supported was the failed version of VAWA that would pick and choose which victims of domestic violence were eligible for support.
Violence isn’t limited to gender, age, race, sexual orientation or any other identity. It can happen to anyone, and it can affect us all.
Many people have contacted Kelly’s offices asking why he would only support a bill that was clearly discriminating against certain groups of women. The only response his office has given is that he does not have to explain any vote that he makes.
Has Kelly become our ruler instead of our representative?




Diane Syphrit
Hermitage
Back
 
Comments
Order Photos!
 
MORE LETTERS TO THE EDITOR HEADLINES
arrow Appropriate honor
arrow Who cares? Many
arrow Dangerous driving
arrow Taxing stupid
 
MOST READ ARTICLES
arrow Ex-county worker sues county for discrimination
arrow Driver hurt in 1-car crash this morning
arrow Man injured as motorcycle, car collide
arrow Missing woman’s remains found