Marketplace   Menu Guide   Complete Pages      
butler eagle
Site last updated: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 Bookmark our site!
Local PennsylvaniaNationalInternationalNews Extras  
Published: February 19, 2013 print this article Print save this article Save email this article Email ENLARGE TEXT increase font decrease font

Court says police don’t have to prove dog training



WASHINGTON — Police don’t have to extensively document the work of drug-sniffing dogs in the field to be able to use the results of their work in court, the Supreme Court ruled today.
Instead, Justice Elena Kagan wrote for a unanimous court, courts should apply the same tests to dog sniffs they do when they look at other issues of whether police have probable cause to take an action.
“The question — similar to every inquiry into probable cause — is whether all the facts surrounding a dog’s alert, viewed through the lens of common sense, would make a reasonably prudent person think that a search would reveal contraband or evidence of a crime,” Kagan said. “A sniff is up to snuff when it meets that test.”





Back
Comments
Order Photos!
 
MORE NEWS HEADLINES
arrow 2 appeals courts give different opinions on Affordable Care Act
arrow Crash downs utility wires on Center Avenue
arrow HEADLINES
arrow Public topics will be limited
 
MOST READ ARTICLES
arrow POLICE REPORTS
arrow Parents group not pleased
arrow Man accused of theft spree
arrow Couple gets married at home plate