Marketplace   Menu Guide   Complete Pages      
butler eagle
Site last updated: Thursday, July 10, 2014 Bookmark our site!
Local PennsylvaniaNationalInternationalNews Extras  
Published: February 19, 2013 print this article Print save this article Save email this article Email ENLARGE TEXT increase font decrease font

Court says police don’t have to prove dog training



WASHINGTON — Police don’t have to extensively document the work of drug-sniffing dogs in the field to be able to use the results of their work in court, the Supreme Court ruled today.
Instead, Justice Elena Kagan wrote for a unanimous court, courts should apply the same tests to dog sniffs they do when they look at other issues of whether police have probable cause to take an action.
“The question — similar to every inquiry into probable cause — is whether all the facts surrounding a dog’s alert, viewed through the lens of common sense, would make a reasonably prudent person think that a search would reveal contraband or evidence of a crime,” Kagan said. “A sniff is up to snuff when it meets that test.”





Back
Comments
Order Photos!
 
MORE NEWS HEADLINES
 
MOST READ ARTICLES
arrow New charges filed against heroin dealer
arrow Cause of apartment fire said suspicious
arrow POLICE REPORTS
arrow Company’s bankruptcy leaves liabilities