If the print dialog box does not automatically appear, open the file menu and choose Print.
Article published January 30, 2013
Judge denies new trial for Jerry Sandusky
HARRISBURG, Pa. — Jerry Sandusky lost a bid for a new trial Wednesday when a judge rejected his argument that his lawyers were not given enough time to prepare for the three-week proceeding that ended with a 45-count guilty verdict. Judge John Cleland’s 27-page order said lawyers for the former Penn State assistant football coach conceded that their post-trial review turned up no material that would have changed their trial strategy. “I do not think it can be said that either of the defendant’s trial counsel failed to test the prosecution’s case in a meaningful manner,” Cleland wrote. “The defendant’s attorneys subjected the commonwealth’s witnesses to meaningful and effective cross-examination, presented evidence for the defense and presented both a comprehensive opening statement and a clearly developed closing argument.” Sandusky also argued that charges should have been thrown out because they were not sufficiently specific, but Cleland said the lack of specific dates did not prevent Sandusky from pursuing an alibi defense. “The defendant has simply argued the offenses did not happen,” Cleland said. Sandusky is serving a 30- to 60-year state prison sentence for sexual abuse of 10 boys, including violent attacks on the children inside Penn State athletics facilities. Sandusky defense lawyer Norris Gelman said Cleland’s ruling means an appeal will be filed to the mid-level Superior Court within the next 30 days. The state attorney general’s office, which prosecuted Sandusky, offered no immediate comment.