Marketplace   Menu Guide   Complete Pages      
butler eagle
Site last updated: Saturday, December 27, 2014 Bookmark our site!
Local PennsylvaniaNationalInternationalNews Extras  
Published: January 1, 2013 print this article Print save this article Save email this article Email ENLARGE TEXT increase font decrease font

Decision encouraging

The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to hear challenges to the federal Defense of Marriage Act and California’s Proposition 8 — two barriers to same-sex marriage — give the court the opportunity to recognize that civil rights are not subject to limitation because of religious tenets.
The entire opposition to same-sex marriage stems from religious intolerance of homosexuality and the unfortunate monopoly religion holds on the concept of “marriage,” neither of which should be given any credence with respect to governmental decisions.
Consenting individuals are free to enter into any contract they wish, including marriage. The government’s role is only to recognize and enforce the terms of the contract, not stipulate the gender of the contracting parties.
As former Vice President Dick Cheney rightly stated, “People ought to be free to enter into any kind of union they wish, any kind of arrangement they wish” because “freedom means freedom for everyone.”




Amesh A. Adalja, M.D.
Penn Township
Back
 
Comments
Order Photos!
 
MORE LETTERS TO THE EDITOR HEADLINES
 
MOST READ ARTICLES
arrow Computer user reports scam to police
arrow POLICE REPORTS
arrow MARRIAGE LICENSES
arrow COURTS